SHAFIQUE-UR-REHMAN versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI 1979), Section 16 bail, grant of further inquiry charge, though it was against the accused to abduct the alleged abductor at the hands of his brother / co-accused. Indicated, it was deliberately reported that the alleged kidnapper was a married woman, but no charges had yet been filed for Zena's commission or attempt to commit adultery, whether in the FIR According to each indictment, the alleged kidnapper was allegedly married after having a marriage contract with her. About the return of the co-accused / brother of the accused and his alleged complainant, that the co-accused was still able to divorce her and, whether the accused had played any role in the case, May have prosecuted the accused, because under section 16 of the Adultery Act (Enforcement Hood), 1979, there is a further investigative offense against the accused, even if it is assumed that he should be charged, as well. Can go Seven years and thus did not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497, the CCPC accused were admitted to bail, under circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Goular Khel lawyer