Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. KARACHI versus KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

In the case of section 42 and dispute 54, the permanent injunction plot in the dispute was allocated to the plaintiff for the construction of his office building, the plaintiff paid a fixed price, the order of allotment / occupation was issued in his favor and Then, in the allotment of physical possession of the plot to the plaintiff, the plaintiff had to complete the construction of the building within two years from the date of the order of occupation of his office, two years after such period. An extension was made, before the expiry of the extension period was granted to the plaintiff for construction, the authority issued notice to the plaintiff which required that To illustrate why the allotment of the plot should be canceled to enhance the construction, the plaintiff replied that the construction extension period has not yet ended after more than ten months of silence for the respondent. In the event of a policy decision, no building can be constructed between the Boating Basin road and the waterline, because of the policy decision that the administration's administration canceled the allotment of the plaintiff's plot under its resolution. Termination of a plot allotted to the plaintiff without notice to him, is in violation of the principles of natural justice, especially when the plaintiff had his personal rights to the allotment of the plot and the transfer of his possession. The cancellation order with the right to increase was not valid; after the construction of the plan by the plaintiff's permanent injunction, the plaintiff had the right to extend the construction on the plot, disrupting the possession, recreation and use of the plot by the plaintiff. Against so long as it is in his favor the use of the same property under the allotment jobs for fresh advocates from Tando Allahyar lawyer