Find a Lawyer

KHURRAM MALIK versus STATE

Section 302 Evidence to be reviewed After confessional statement to reduce the incidents of the accused, after committing the murder, the body of the deceased was cut into pieces and thrown to different places, after the arrest of the accused. , Its confessional statement filed under section 164 under, CR was assassinated in the presence of two eyes. At the conclusion of the trial, the trial court recovered the body-shattering witnesses, sentenced to death, but the High Court reduced the sentence to life imprisonment, under the scope of the appeal. The suspect was that the conditions for a minimum sentence were guaranteed for him. Correctly the defendant demonstrated inhumane treatment by cutting the body of the victim who had been brutally and desperately killed and thrown to various places if the accused went to the special facts and circumstances of the case. On the basis of his plea for lower sentence claims, he was burdened to establish the same Supreme Court in which no lesser incident was claimed by the accused. The revised sentence was set aside and the accused was sentenced to death. The appeal was dismissed best advocate from Warah lawyer