Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZAQ SALEEMI versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER, GUJRAT

16 and 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 rejected the respondents of the constitutional nomination papers that the petitioner was not a eligible voter as he was not included in the voter list. Was rejected, but the Returning Officer on the Appellate District put aside the decision of the Returning Officer under an unwanted order and rejected the nomination papers of the applicants. The two sides kept different records in support of their claims, which the first parties had against each other, a certified copy issued by the District Returning Office, signed by the Returning Officer, revealing that a The applicant's name is present, while the documents submitted by one of the respondents showed that the applicant was not a registered voter, both parties disagreed and did not determine the authenticity of the documents prepared by the other party. Could go And finally it was found out which set of documents was genuine and if there were any fake documents then the goods produced by the applicants were briefly pushed aside, they were participating in the election High Court. Will not, with constitutional jurisdiction, determine the truth of the documents, which can be made only after recording the evidence and it will be in fitness if the applicants are allowed to contest the elections and if If they succeed, the respondents may raise the question in the election petition which is decided by the election tree B. Which will be used to record the evidence online advocate from Mehrab Pur lawyer