Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HASHIM versus AMEER HAIDER SHAH

Section 417 (2A) Complaint Regulation (XLV of 1860), FIR was filed against section 324 for evil more than a month after the incident. The complainant nominated eight persons who were allegedly of various types. One of the prosecution's witnesses first denied that the complainant was his nephew, but later confessed that he was the son of a brother who could change his statement in such a short time, Can go to the extent and cannot be relied upon. According to the testimony given by the testimony, the trial court's evidence correctly denied by the prosecution, which was untrustworthy, defective and untrustworthy, leading to distrust, eye evidence, witnesses who were related to each other. Could not always be rejected for that reason. They were very closely related to each other, but could be followed safely, so if this belief confirms the material details of the encouraging, convincing, and C, then any crime is recovered from the possession of the accused. The prosecution failed to impress the trial court on the credibility of the witnesses, the prosecution witnesses failed to impress the trial court on their credibility. Or interfere. Unless the record shows that the superior credibility was in the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses, the verdict of acquittal would create a double notion of innocence. inheritance advocates near Sibi lawyer