DR. AFTAB SHAH versus PAKISTAN EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED
Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract in relation to the residential plot that the plaintiff claimed he had purchased from a housing society claimant, who was not a federal government employee and a member of the society, was not entitled to a plot allotment. ? The then administration of the Society presented to him the said plot, which he accepted and thoroughly considered the sale. The occupation was conveyed to him even a sub-license was registered in his favor and a letter of allotment was issued to him in order to obtain a valid allotment of the residential plot in the Society, clearly in the license agreement. But it was stated that a person must keep two basic things. Qualification means that he must be an employee of the Federal Government and must be a member / shareholder of the Society which the plaintiff lacks as an Administrator for qualification, who at the time was the Head of the Society. Ignorance was not expected that the plaintiff was not a member of the society nor was he unaware of his authority to allocate the administrator of residential plots, thus misusing his authority when a public worker. The options were severely disconnected by a written document then strictly exercised on such options Had to go There is no public party in the four corners of the boundary that has been entrusted with the task of dealing with public property, should consider itself an owner of unconstitutional or unorganized powers that can be used or misused to the prescribed limits, In the present case, the administrator has fallen out of his jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
