MUHAMMAD ABID AKHTAR versus CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LAHORE
Article 25A, 38 (3) and 51 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition for Support to the Dismissal of Employment, The Eligible Petitioner Retired, was reinstated, but the Applicant. Returning benefits were not allowed. It was requested that he continue to work during his tenure and prayed for the benefits to be paid back. None of the two witnesses examined by employers had made the statement that the applicant was an employee or worked during the relevant period. The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the applicants against the Labor Court decision on which the applicant filed a constitutional petition against the unanimous decision of the Labor Court and the appellate tribunal where the worker made an oral claim. It was not a profitable job anywhere. To prove to the employer that the worker was so employed, but the employer may not present any evidence to prove that the employee / applicant was deprived of employment while the employee was dismissed. Permitting a constitutional application, rejecting illegal orders to the applicant, hearing of the petition filed by the applicant, without illegal, void and legal authority, will be deemed to have been granted with full back benefits. \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
