Find a Lawyer

QAMAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus STATE

Section 4 (2) (a) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 19 (14) The question posed for the entire Bench decision was what was the effect of Section 12 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. Or any provision relating thereto to the exclusive jurisdiction of those who hear crimes, the third schedule of cases of persons under the age of 18 at the time of the commission of terrorist acts under Items 1 and 3 (and Item (not under 2 or 4). The Terrorism Act, 1997 will be transferred to the relevant youth courts, consisting of sessions of the relevant districts and magistrates' courts where they are allegedly committed, and in accordance with the procedure proposed in the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000. Action will be taken. , The cases will go beyond the stage they were moved to and no witnesses or de novo trials will be remembered. However, the kidnapping or abduction or abduction of persons involved in Item 1 of the Counter Terrorism Act, 1997 (such as Item 4 of Schedule 1), firearms or explosives in synagogues and courts. The use of the Content). Staying Heard by the Anti-Terrorist Courts Anti-terrorism courts will not be required to follow the rules and regulations of juvenile courts, but still do not conform to this law under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, and during the trial of children. Protection will be provided by such courts. Principles Pakistan, top advocate family court from Turbat lawyer