Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASIR versus STATE

Section 404040 Prohibition Code (XLV of 1860), application for retraction of section 302 witnesses, was dismissed by trial. Failure to appear in the court when the case is decided for evidence in the court causes the petitioner to file an application under it. Section 4040, CRPC, on that day, called the accused to call back the investigating witnesses, saying that the request was made after the conclusion of the witnesses 'inspection and for recording of the defendants' statement under Case 222 It was decided, the PC held, the opportunity to cross-examine the witness was not merely a formality but a valuable right and best way to verify the truth was that the accused in the absence of his lawyer. Can't be convicted who chose to be absent in the recording history of the evidence was not ill of the accused. That is, if the prosecution's witnesses were not subjected to interstate investigations, they could be immediately sentenced for failing to defend. After requesting the prosecution's witnesses at a later date for the trial, the trial court's direction aside to allow the accused to investigate the prosecution's witnesses allowed a modification application under it Was gone power of attorney advocate Shikarpur lawyer