Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZMAT versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, MEMBER JUDICIAL-III

R 19 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appointments, Appointment of Rules of Antiquity If the Shariah Bench of the Supreme Court decides on the death of the petitioner's father, who was permanent The limber was, the applicant was called to vacate the lumber holder's application and finally the limber holder was appointed by the collector's order filed by the aggrieved plaintiff against the collector's order, after which the Commissioner filed a review request. The Plaintiff went through the Board of Revenue, keeping in mind the orders of the Collector and Commissioner and the respondent The constitutional petition was filed by the respondents through the appointment under which the applicant challenged the improper order of the Member Board of Revenue. That the order was against the law and the facts and that it was wrongly held that its property was insufficient to protect the Zar-e-India, and that the preliminary rule was also applicable in the case of the applicant. Because at the time it was not declared un-Islamic and the applicant's performance was temporary, the limber was unsatisfactory. The record of justification shows that the applicant's land was sufficient to meet the needs of India and there was no rule in this field regarding how much land owned by a timber owner and that it was merely to meet the requirements. On the other hand, the respondent was a stranger and had the same educational qualifications as the applicant when the applicant had reason for action, at which time the initial rule was not un-Islamic, the Shariah Bench of the Supreme Court under which the case was tried. best law firms from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer