Find a Lawyer

SYED MUHAMMAD AHMED versus STATE

Articles 420/467/468/471 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 4 (1), 63, 173 and 190 Police Rules, 1934, R 24 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) as directed by the High Court. In the constitutional plea earlier, the applicants who were the accused in the FIR will not be treated nor prosecuted, as only the investigating officer told the High Court that the accused That he could not establish in this case that he had not forged a document or that the complainant in any way could have secured any beneficial investigation pursuant to Section 4 (1). The CCPC was not merely collecting evidence and determining the crime. Or the courts were charged with the innocence of the accused, and the police officers investigating the matter could never be allowed to assign the responsibility, provided that the section 63, CRPC, did Except for the special order of the Magistrate Rule 24 7 of the Police Rules, 1934, no one had even banned the cancellation of the FI without the orders of the magisterial provisions of section 173, the CRPC only After the goods were provided. During the interrogation by Section HA, the result was to report the magistrate as serious under Section 90, CR PC, and the magistrate had to decide whether the accused had deserved to be prosecuted, The order issued by the High Court was issued only by the Inquiry Officer's alleged opinion, the court was not lasting and changed its application in the appeal for leave. famous supreme court advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer