Find a Lawyer

LIBRA ENTERPRISES versus MESSRS MACTER PHARMACEUTICALS (PVT.) LTD.

A. VIII, R2L Amendment Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3HC appeals suit for recovery of dues, claiming recovery of dues against appellant for delivery to respondents, By mutual consent, the pending distribution was canceled and the defendant issued a certificate stating that the defendant had actually paid the outstanding amount through the appellant and that there was nothing against the applicants. Which was confirmed by the claimant issuing the certificate in which the certificate was presented that the defendant was entitled to all due diligence. Were. There is nothing left to pay to the appellant and the respondents, the single judge ruled with the observation that the appellants were presented in the suit and their counsel, despite the appellant filing his / her lawyer. Absent on several dates, the single judge sued defendant's tile. In keeping with the affidavit, the evidence filed by the respondents in the evidence of their claim should be decided on the merits of the parties, and the rules and regulations that were set up for the attainment of justice should be granted with qualifications. But justice must come in the way of justice. Let them be allowed to defend themselves in the case so that they can be heard and decide on its merits, the appeal allowed, the unclean verdict and the decree passed in the case re-called, and the appellant was asked Opportunity was provided to submit a written statement within the stipulated period. property advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer