Find a Lawyer

CUSTOMS APPEAL NO.K-514 OF 2005, DECIDED ON 7TH OCTOBER, 2005 versus CUSTOMS APPEAL NO.K-514 OF 2005, DECIDED ON 7TH OCTOBER, 2005

Sections 16, 32 and 181 Imports and Export (Control) (Act (XXXX of 1950)), section 3 (1) section RO 374 (1) / 02, dated 15 6 2002 prohibiting or prohibiting the import and export of goods. Option After inspecting the old and imported imports, the equipment / accessories used for the Industrial Wine Project Department alleged that the shipment contained a variety of valves that were not imported. The Administration Collector stated that the appellant violated the provisions of Articles 16 and 32 of the Customs Act 1969. 1) The Appellant of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950, claims that the components and components of imported and used machinery for their plants, if not imported under the import policy, are subject to section 181 of the Customs Act 1969 Can be reissued and allowed to be released against. Redemption penalty payment department approves gross seizure order of illicit goods Customs Act, 1969 Unclaimed goods were claimed to be closed and were part and parcel of the plant and manufactured in industrial wines. It was required for its operation, as it is believed to be an independent import of some prohibited goods with the intention of violating the law. The appellate tribunal cannot allow the release of such goods on payment of a penalty equal to 25% of their value in addition to import duties. immigration advocate from Tobatek Singh lawyer