Find a Lawyer

KHAIRULLAH versus FAZLE MANAN

Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the Section 115 suit, in its first case, sought for the respondent's respondents in the land to the extent of 11/3 3 fifty, and he later allegedly obtained his share of the 11th. An amended case was filed against. 1/3, `Pachs' to 14 2 / 3`s Pachs' and the parties' consent was sent to settle the matter with` Ma'ad Qazi, who brought the resolution through his ula Silah document and related. The civil judge sued him to file a case. Sylvia Nana / Terms of the Contract Subsequently, Respondent No.1 approached the Civil Judge / Alaallah Qazi for approval of the final decree in which he alleged that the Dachaus had been ruled in their favor on 14/2/5. Went and the civil judge appointed a local commission, who gave its report in the matter to which the petitioner objected, but the civil judge passed the order in favor of the respondents, which the district judge appealed. I was retained and the petitioner revised against the judgment that the petitioner claimed that the deputy judge had, in his brochure / agreement, sued the locality Shin was never made in any part of any party, acknowledged that the judge's decision with Salih told the judge appointed in the church, there was no mention of the persons concerned. Shares of the parties, but nevertheless, said that the local commission proceeded with the preparation of its report and likewise allocated several shares and proceeded beyond the duty assigned to them, which was directed by the trial court of Moin Qazi. The evidence was not, it can be attributed. Distribution of suit property, advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer