Find a Lawyer

AQEEL HUSSAIN versus MST. ALIA BIBI

Articles 8 and 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XIV, RI and O XLI, R 31 suits that rely on the defendants to establish a claim and claim for possession of the property documents were presented satisfactorily. That happened through statements from witnesses presented. They all said that the witnesses had been subjected to a lengthy and investigative cross examination, but they had to face successful scrutiny, the two courts below had properly settled the factual dispute. The matter was dealt with in a threadbare manner and after applying freely, it came to a conclusion. The mind, which cannot be bothered with the jurisdiction, the jurisdiction was not identified by the courts below for not reading any misunderstanding and evidence, as well as the appellate court in detail on every aspect of the matter. And presented the matter in detail, leaving no issue. For further consideration, the appellate court below carefully dealt with the cases involved and delivered its conclusions on all points of dispute and it appears that no prejudice was caused by the defendants. In view of the parties' plea, the issues were compiled and no important or final issue was escaped from the notice of the trial court which was not to provide the matter with the appellate court. The Appellate Court, as required by law under the AXLI, R-31, CPC, points out the reasons for the determination, give its decision on it, and the reasons for that decision. top advocates from Khushab lawyer