Find a Lawyer

FORMERLY UNITED WOOLEN MILLS LTD. versus UNITED WOOLEN MILLS LTD. WORKERS\' UNION LABOUR WELFARE

Complaints to the section Oz 11A & 12 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Sections 46 and 48 for the termination of the services of the employees appealed to the High Court employers that the West Pakistan Department of Industrial and Commercial Employment Establishment under O11A should be closed. After obtaining an order to terminate the employee's employment services under the provisions of Section O12 of the Standing Orders (Ordinance, 1968 and Employers, Section O12 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968). Had the right to terminate. The employees, but subject to certain conditions, which were kept on record, had properly disclosed that the management had explained the reason for the closure of the establishment for termination of the employees' services, in lieu of notice. I was given one month's salary to employees. The factory was closed after the closure, and all of them acknowledged receiving a confession that once the establishment was allowed to close under the law, then such establishment Had the jurisdiction to provide the employees with services, termination of services in the circumstances, could not be called for any other purpose. Or disobeyed the Labor Court's misconduct order, which allowed employees to file jointly filed complaints against termination of their services, which the High Court found to be on the record An appeal against the evidence was granted \ r \ n \ r \ n best advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer