Find a Lawyer

SYED NAFS-E-NABI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MULTAN

Sections 4 (1) and (2), 18, 28 C&34 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 96 Acquisition of Compound Interest from the Date of Prior Notice with reference to the Legal Court Trial Court It has been entitled to compound interest on the amount of compensation from 1997 to fixed payment, further claiming the appellants that they were entitled to compound interest from 1981 when the first notification was issued under Sections 28C and 34 of Land Acquisition. had gone. The Act, 1894, was rejected by the trial court. The appellant's contention was that he had been entitled to compound interest since 1981 as the land was taken over when the first land acquisition notification was issued this year. The respondent was that the appellant was not entitled to any interest as no further proceedings on the acquisition of the land had been initiated after the issuance of the first notification. This land was acquired only after the issuance of the last notification in 1997, so the appellant had no comprehensive interest claim as he was not paid his land as per the prevailing rates of 1997 nor did he At rates 1981, no doubt, the first notification was issued under section 4 (1) of the Act in 1981, but there was no record to show that the notification referred to in section 4 (2) of 1981 The land was taken over after the release of Under the Act, a special procedure containing certain traditions was provided for the acquisition of land after the issuance of the notification appellant, in the present case, has failed to show that section 4 (2) before this Act. The aforementioned formal action was already taken. Last note top civil advocates from Dudial lawyer