Find a Lawyer

FOZIA SHABBIR versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE

Refusing to record applicant's second statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 164 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitutional Appeal Magistrate, PC endorsement neither Magistrate nor Sessions Court The CCP did not prohibit the recording of any person's statement, refusing to record the second statement of the applicant's abductor under Section 134, CRPC section ?44; If it already stands, the PC's first and foremost prerequisite for the authenticity or truth of a statement under CR 5, 164, was that it should be freely recorded Should be. According to the abductor, he was in custody of his captors at the time of recording his first statement and was forced to make a statement, which led to his abduction. As a free agent and his first statement was not voluntary, Section 164 was ordered at the time the magistrate was required to record the applicant's statement under Section 164, CR PC, so that it could be considered under law. Constitutional application will be allowed if he / she wishes. immigration advocates from Hattian lawyer