Find a Lawyer

PORT SERVICES COMPANY LTD. versus PORT SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE

A VII, R 13, O II, R 2 and Section 11 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Section 17, when the plaintiff's previous case that went into arbitration and was dismissed by an award which the court ruled Was made and had no appeal. As a matter of fact and law it was finalized and finalized between the parties and the plaintiff was subsequently prevented from reopening the case by a lawsuit which was the same issue on all fours, oh, R Was the first case in the case of 13, the CPC plaintiff, in order to retain the subsequent suit, must show that not only the subsequent suit was timely but also that the earlier suit must be demarcated. II was not prevented by R 2, in which case the CPC had no relevance to the plaintiff's claim in the subsequent case, in substance, it was not the same case as the plaintiff in the previous case. I was, in the circumstances, stopped by the rule of the race judiciary top civil advocates from Sagri lawyer