Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED versus HABIB OIL MILLS (PVT.) LTD.

Sections 46 and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Appeal from the Appeals of the HC, dismissed by the section 0 15 service dismissal complaint, claimed that their The order was not worked. The dismissal and that their dismissal order was a violation of the law against which the appellant filed a petition against the order, was dismissed on the basis that the appellant specifically took the stand. He received a letter dated 19 1 1998, stating that he was dismissed from the job and before he had received any such affidavit in connection with the petition filed by the appellant on such a positive request. And since the order was not received, it cannot be assumed that they have been filed within a specific period from their date. The matter was banned from time to time by the fact that it was a question that required proper investigation and the recording of evidence, but none of the parties were allowed to file a labor court. There was no justification that it could be concluded that the fact that the letter of dismissal was actually sent by the Labor Court to the appellant or served on him, was a violation of the law, in the circumstances of the Labor Court. The order of appeal was allowed to be set aside and the remand of the case was obtained which should be decided by law first. immigration advocates email from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer