Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ QURESHI versus STATE

Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Guarantee, the denial of a prohibited quantity of substance recovered from the accused shall determine the penalty and not the percentage of the chemical inspector employed. ? And thereby it is mentioned in the report that the proportion of liquid preparations to be calculated in liquid preparations, in this regard, was recovered from the accused in the absence of liquid form. Mentioned in the report. Was not relevant and his case would not be covered under Section 9 (b) of the said Act. Similarly, section 18 of the Act provided that the quality of the prohibited export contract would be observed only if the case. The amount of fines will be assessed at the time of the decision of seven. The kilogram of marijuana and two kilograms of heroin was recovered from the accused, which was covered by Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, while lowering the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), the CCP raiding party. There was no rivalry or misconduct against any of the accused in the case for false involvement in the case, not enough fine material was collected by the prosecution to link the accused. The trial had already begun, accused denied in bail matters \ r \ n \ r \ n list of advocates from Punch lawyer