Find a Lawyer

SAJID versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 452 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), were recorded within an hour and a half of the incident in the daylight in the courtyard of the policeman's house. On the basis of which the FIR was registered, the eyewitnesses were natural witnesses to the incident as a prisoner of the house and despite their relationship with the victim, they had no animosity or misconduct against the accused and they were in their custody. The evidence was completely free of oral testimony was natural and truthful, despite medical evidence, motivations and circumstance attendance and minor contradictions and contradictions. As was confirmed, the food digested in the stomach of the deceased was not indicated before the incident, even before taking his breakfast. Eyewitnesses cannot be expected to accurately define distances and measure any discrepancies. Their credibility will not be doubted, even if the conviction of the accused is lower than the harmony of the courts. The results did not face any misreading or non-reading of evidence or in this case an appeal for interference with a material defect was refused accordingly. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Bagh lawyer