Find a Lawyer

RASHID HUSSAIN MANGI versus HON\'BLE REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OF SINDH

Section 3B Sindh Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973), RR 4 (1) (b) (iii), 5 and 6 Appeal to Appeal Charge sheet against the appellant for mismanagement of judicial services Was later removed from the job. Giving her a personal hearing on the allegation of fleeing her home without prior permission or leave of the house, and the applicant had a habit of getting herself discharged, because issuing the final showcase notice to the appellant was vague. There were no specific charges. The action show cause notice leveled against him should include specific and unambiguous allegations, including a momentarily detailed description of alleged misconduct by a public servant, aimed at accusing the public servant of being accused. Was to be able to explain my position on the subject. Opportunity to dismiss charges was not possible unless the details of the charges were brought to the notice of the SHO. The W-cause notice, which was the basis of the appellant's disciplinary action, was clearly lacking in the details on which occasions, the appellant obtained his permission and / or approved his leave in his home city. Gone, in which no specific examples were cited. Indicate that the appellant had formed an alleged habit of getting himself discharged. The appellant was presented with a show cause notice, irrespective of the required details and the appellant was denied the opportunity to accurately describe his position, the subsequent action was unsuccessful and He was ordered to be fined for his removal from office. However api immigration advocates email from Ukba lawyer