Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED versus FULL BENCH, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

According to Sections 7, 8, 22FF and 22FE Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional application industry, the trade union applicants / employers, objecting to the registration of the union, claimed that the trade union initially. The registration order was issued. The order of the notice to the applicants / employer and the order to give such registration was not to be said, but the Registrar was approved by the trade unions without the use of their mind; Yes, in view of the fact that the petitioner admitted that although the notice was issued to the applicant, it was at an incomplete address and no separate notice was issued to the other organizations of the applicant Syed organizations, The applicant owned, did not apply as a petitioner in the constitutional application had gone. Even otherwise, the question is whether the notice was issued to the employer, the fact and the question to be found at this point is that the appellate authorities had already reported that the employer was required to participate in the registration process. The notice was issued, but the employer was called absent and in his absence the registration process was finalized, finding such fact, did not seek decision in the constitutional jurisdiction by the High Court. Go. The affected order was a speaking order and the requirements of Section 7 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, were met when the registrar of the trade union appointed his subordinate officer to investigate, which he said was satisfied. Subsequently fulfilled the requirements as Registrar property advocates from Bahawalnagar lawyer