AZIZ-UR-REHMAN versus EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Appointment In response to an advertisement in the newspaper regarding the appointment of CT teachers, applications were received and 75% on an annual / batchwise basis and 25% on merit basis to fill vacancies. Applications for were received. ?? As a result of the electoral process, authorities notified certain appointments. Initially, twenty persons were appointed. Of these, five were appointed on merit, one against the disabled quota and fourteen for the designated posts for the year. Was set on Various other appointments were made on different dates on quota / wise basis, in which applicants had no objection to the pre-appointment of 20 persons, but were subsequently made on different dates. The previous appointments challenged that he was a senior in the Beach, but were discriminated against and junior people in the Beach were later appointed controversial NTS was made keeping in view the Beach-wise seniority and some matters. I was appointed candidates who did not even apply for the appointment or to take the test and interview Khab did not participate in the process, saying the appointment was later due to being legally flawed, which was based on overuse of authority. And discrimination of rights granted to certain of the applicants under the relevant rules shall be deemed to permit the applicants of all applicants who were eligible on a year-by-year basis, and where by year the seniority has applied to the applicants. Vacancies available / Vacancies available, should be considered dismissal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Sudhnoti lawyer