FAQIR ABDUL MAJEED KHAN versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER, MIANWALI
R36 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Application for counting of votes was allowed to test the wrong ballot before finalizing the final result. The preliminary count reversal question was whether the district Direction given by Returning? The Returning Officer was found to have violated the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2005 Rule 36 of the Rules for the checking of invalid votes; Was given The papers were excluded from the count by the Presiding Officer and if he knew that such ballots should not have been removed so much, he said that the ballot papers had been cast in favor of the candidate for which the district The returning officer voted on his instruction. Only the Returning Officer is required to perform his / her legal duty in connection with the consolidation of the result. According to the Rules and the resultant Returning Officer, the Returning Officer has been barred by rule 36 (6) from counting only valid ballot papers unless directed by the District Returning Officer and invalid votes. Direction of District Returning Officer if not counted. , Was not a violation of Rule 36 (3) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2005
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Orakzai lawyer