Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHABBIR versus MALIK IMRAN SHAHBAZ, RETURNING OFFICER, UNION COUNCILS

35, 36, 33, 3 (f), 65 and 71 Constitutions of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 225 Appropriate Method for Constitutional Request The Election Petition Presiding Officer and Assistant Presiding Officer had disputed that they had forgotten to open a ballot box. Are. Count the ballot papers contained in it which were not denied the fact that the ballot papers were also declared to be bad without opening any other ballot box, the word dispute in R3 (F) of Punjab Local Elections Was used as a noun and verb. Rules, 2005 which meant agreement or disagreement between two persons, groups, etc. Due to such disputes, the Presiding Officer, Assistant Returning Officer and Returning Officer, thus, failed to perform their functions of counting and re-counting the required ballot papers under RL 35 and 36, Punjab Local Government Election. Declaration of Rolls, 2005 Votes in other ballot boxes that were never opened because the never-damaged ballot papers were clearly declared invalid in view of R33 of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2005, Under the circumstances, the application of the election will not be an appropriate remedy according to Article 199 of the Constitution. The petition was directed by the High Court to the Returning Officer to strictly comply with the law in the presence of the parties concerned and to open the ballot box which is not open for the counting of ballot papers. best law firms from Mian Walli lawyer