SIKANDAR RAZA versus STATE
Article 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), regardless of the judicial confession of the accused was also brought on record while it was secured indoors on the identification of huge quantities of 30 kilograms. ? The Chemical Examiner's report about a sample of 1200 grams of hashish belonging to the trunk was positive. The recovered charisma was in the special knowledge of the trunk from which the marijuana was recovered, its key was open and opened to the accused. ? The trunks and other pernicious articles presented at the trial reinforced the prosecution's case. The defendant had taken a very contradictory position in his defense that was not credible. Legal interference, misspellings, or misidentification cannot be identified. The following is the crime of appeal for the accused to appeal to the courts
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer