Find a Lawyer

BOARD OF GOVERNORS, AREA STUDY CENTRE versus MS. FARAH ZAHRA

Section 10 (1) (o) Excellent Employee Centers (Service, Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1989 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appointment for the post of Assistant Professor, Experience Period, Selection Board In response to the question of calculation, the appointment of the respondent for the post has been recommended but the Board of Governors did not qualify it for the post of High Court under the constitutional jurisdiction and approve the respondent through the applicant. Is. Consider the Supreme Court. If the High Court can issue a writ of mandamus in the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution, it shall direct the applicant to the post of Assistant Professor. Whether or not the writ jurisdiction can alter the results of the High Court Board of Governors, who say that the defendant has no four years' experience in the relevant field in a national or international organization. What should be the mode of determining whether the experience available to the respondents can be considered as equivalent to four years or above, in order to qualify for the appointment of Assistant Professor. It is the responsibility of the High Court to decide the factual dispute between the parties in respect of the defendant's 4-year experience in the relevant field in a national or international organization. Whether the defendants could be denied relief in a writ jurisdiction for technical reasons. Even if the petition is filed without the approval of the Board of Governors. And cannot the Higher Education Commission calculate the respondent's four-year experience in the exercise of powers under section 10 (1) (o) of the Centers for Excellence Act 1974, so that he can make an appointment against it? For the inheritance advocates near Ghotki lawyer