Find a Lawyer

AHMED ALI AYAZ versus LESCO AND OTHERS

Applicants were sued against show cause notices under section 49 (e) and 63 unfair labor practices by the employer for alleged theft of electric meters and some battery related to these meters. The relationship was given under section 49 (e) of the Ordinance 2002. The applicant said that he had suffered due to the activities of the trade union, but no further action was taken as the applicant knocked on the door of the National Industrial Relations Commission regardless of the jurisdiction of the Commission. Do not wait for respondents to respond by showing cause notice by interim withholding order and preventing respondents from taking any further action; nothing was on record to show that the defendants had done anything wrong. What constitutes hard work, if that were the case, could have taken some drastic action. Action has been taken against the applicant, but only show-cause notice was issued. Several persons in the administration had pledged that if the applicant did not find the response to the cause notice satisfactory, the application would not be made without regular inquiry. No action will be taken against the applicant; further action is allowed in response to the showcase notice filed by the petitioner's premature respondent. Submitted by the applicant and, if required, applicants may pass the National Industrial Relations Commission, subject to jurisdictional question immigration advocates phone number from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer