Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

A. VII, R 11 The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VII of 1961), Section 4 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 39 and 55 of the plaintiff's suit refusal to declare the plaintiff's effect is that of the plaintiff and the plaintiff Nakhinma has registered with the Metropolitan among the deceased daughter. The corporation should be declared as fraudulent, fraudulent, fraudulent and invalid, with no effect on its rights and the MetroPolitan Corporation may be prevented from issuing any copy of the said marriage through a permanent injunction and for the death of its deceased daughter. Prevent or pretend to be a husband. For any purpose, the marriage plaintiff sued the plaintiff and pleaded that the plaintiff had no reason to sue for the trial. The matter was seized. After the plaintiff's dismissal, the appellate trial court's dismissal of the contrary against such order was also denied, the defendant claiming to be the deceased's husband, the plaintiff's daughter, allegedly a fake On the basis of anonymity and in that capacity under section 4, Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, and on behalf of the bride in question, the plaintiff's deceased daughter's part I will try to inherit the property. He will claim himself to be the son-in-law of the plaintiff, and in this case the right of the plaintiff to interfere in the affairs of the plaintiff's family, but certainly the marriage contract was one of the reasons for the action of the plaintiff's decision, As it stands, it showed no cause of action and thus could not be denied by request of O VII, R 11, CPC. power of attorney advocate Leepa lawyer