CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD versus MESSRS TRIPPLE EM (PVT.) LTD.
Article 84 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Warehouse permit retaining goods was not denied the warehouse permit by a written order and the Department filed a constitutional petition in its comments Did not say that internal sanctions were not verbally denied. Order to refuse exposure to heat and humidity for 27 days for imported goods at dry port, was, in the circumstances, arbitrary, unrealistic and in violation of the provisions of Section 84, Customs Act, 1969, mutual by oral orders. The ban was denied, without written order contrary to the law, there was no question of legally availing by the importer and the department \ In spite of verbal orders, the importer was required to comply with the Constitution's appeal. Can be instructed to benefit from. The petition was sustained under constitutional petition \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer