MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATE
Section 2?2 (b) / & / and 4 394 / Constitution, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), there was no delay in requiring clarification from the prosecution in the registration of the trial, and Defense evidence was denied by the superior. For convincing and respectable reasons, the court below independently examined the entire evidence without any misinformation, misdiagnosis or any kind of false advertising, which died in identifying its attackers. There was no possibility of error from the person and he was released from any outside quarterly indication and indication. The statement of the deceased was also based on the evidence and circumstances of the case. Medical evidence was legally proven and the circumstances of this case reinforced the dying statement, Aich had become an important evidence against the accused, and the defense had failed to allege the same offense, from appeal to appeal. Was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Bannu lawyer