Find a Lawyer

SHAHAMAND ALI versus MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ

A. XXXVII, suit 2 and 3 for the recovery of money on the basis of the promise claimant, was claimed for the petition to defend the authenticity of the nomination note, the defendant alleged that it was under threat by the plaintiff. Was obtained and, by examining himself as his own witness, forcibly proved the plaintiff's conclusive proof of promise, that the final witness of the promise note confirmed the plaintiff's position, he Admitted that he had complained against the alleged act of obtaining a thumbprint in front of any forum. Under pressure, the defendant also admitted that he had not filed a petition with the superior officer against the man who reported no report to the police about the alleged forcible threats and intimidation. Neither the case nor the case for the dismissal of the conviction note was not credible to the defendant with regard to oppression and intimidation, in the circumstances before the trial court properly reviewing all aspects of the case. The suit's judge did not demand any interference solicitors from Ziarat lawyer