Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD ULLAH KHAN versus BEGUM HALEEMA KHAN

In section 302 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), 439 applicants who were called to stand trial in a criminal case were not listed in the FIR, but were later named by the complainant. The filing was submitted through a supplementary statement through the application. The petitioner was dismissed, after passing through the evidence on record, to ask the applicant to face a criminal trial and trial, which was dismissed and challenged before the High Court in the revision petition. Was allowed, the trial court's order was set aside and the case remanded. With the direction that the case will be decided on the basis of the material available on record with the trial court after hearing by both parties, the hearing of the petition filed by the trial court seeking the applicant for a criminal trial. An application will be made to examine the available material rather than applying an open mind. On the record, the petitioner was summoned to seek the fact that the trial court's disputed order had no adjournment decision, which on this short score was not reliably relied upon. And the application filed by the complainant will be considered pending and the trial court will decide. Instead of being influenced by any observation of the High Court in remanding the same case, using a free mind lawer from fb area from Haripur lawyer