Find a Lawyer

SAJID MUMTAZ versus BASHARAT

Sections 365 A / 114, 302 (b) / 34 & 201 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (a), 7 (b) and 6 (2) (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The writ petition of the accused seeking expert ransom by the High Court, against the success of the accused, was not fully comparable by the expert in writing, otherwise; At the time of investigation under Section 342, evidence of the case was never before the accused. The CCPC picked up the footprints and tires near the body of the victim, whose prosecutor claimed that he was the suspect's jogger and motorcycle, was found unfit to compete, with his jacket There was no further recovery. The prosecution's slip on payment of school fees also did not help, as neither the jacket was proven to be dead nor the fee payment was independently of the quarter-related photo frame on which the picture was made. The allegations contained in the home depended on Ed as a means of identifying the suspect, a prosecutor's unsuccessful attempt, as the deceased boy was allegedly kidnapped by his neighbors in a public place whose identity must have been there. Had recovered and then the chloroform was restored. Useless because there was no evidence that chloroform was given to the kidnapper either at the time of the incident or at any later stage, nor was there any medical report that the knife contained blood. Had no stains and was commonly found as a knife in every household as a kitchen knife for a couple belonging to the victim. family advocate from Hafizabad lawyer