TEHSIL COUNCIL TRIBAL AREA (DE-EXCLUDED AREA), D.G. KHAN THROUGH TEHSIL NAZIM versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, L
Sections 54 and 116 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for taxation on cement and cement stone Tehsil Council, under a notification imposed on cement, the cement company filed separate appeals against the tax levied on the cement company. ???? The tax and the provincial government accepted the appeals and directed the Tehsil Council to withdraw the tax / fee notification after approval of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001 under the Tehsil Council 5 116 and after filing the application the cement. The letter itself was reported to the company. That the cement company was exempted from tax in category (vii). In view of the latest development that took place during the constitutional petition period under which the applicant acknowledged in his letter that all types of cement stone, marble stone, etc., by conveyor belt, trucks and trolleys of the cement company. Was excavated and transported. Exemption from the tax category (iii) The Tehsil Council imposed a letter of intent imposed by the Tehsil Council, while in the auction notice published in the paper, the Tehsil Council sent its letter to the cement company. There was an attempt to resign from the conveyance of the conveyor belt only. The cement company challenged the proceedings of the Tehsil Council by appealing to the provincial government on taxation of all kinds of cement and marble stone, etc., and on the excavation and transportation of it, the order was challenged. Complies with, withholding action from the Tehsil Council once again. Declaring that local governments should be taxing excavation and taxing it as welcome.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Shogram lawyer