Find a Lawyer

SILAWAR KHAN versus MST. HAJRA BIBI

Section 302 (b) testimony testimony case The prosecution's case was filled with suspicion and the evidence on record was not sufficient to convict the accused in any way for the crime against him, eyewitnesses said. The statements of the victim were a material weakness and they tried to improve the case on various material aspects. The natural weaknesses in the evidence of the eyewitnesses had negated their presence at the time of the incident. The presence of other witnesses was suspicious, so evidence of recovery, stimulants, wounds inflicted on fugitives or medical victims. The evidence about this, even if it was proved, could not have been pursued by the prosecutor's case, the prosecution's story was untrustworthy and the allegations against the defendants seem to have resulted from consultation and deliberation. The report is delayed by about two to two hours. After the explanation was not explained by the prosecution, a reasonable limitation would be that the defendants were substituted and they were wrongly involved despite having been found to have confused ocular testimony in the circle with confidence or something of intrinsic significance. , Could not be used to support the prosecution case, 5 bore 5 pistols were recovered from the scene, were not sent to the firearm specialist to find out. A weapon or a different weapon was removed and no such misrepresentation was offered. Such error by the prosecutor is extremely fatal to the prosecution and will essentially end the prosecution's case. registration advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer