MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE
Section 302 (b) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the ocular evidence presented by the complainant and other prosecution witnesses was fully supported by the medical evidence, according to the records, put in the FIR. Had to change his motive was given a separate statement which had no connection with the theory presented by the accused in his statement recorded under Section 234 of the case, the CCP accused about that purpose. No question was asked, as mentioned in the FIR, that during the prosecution prosecution, thus, it had fully established its case against him. The defendants cannot identify this by any kind of unlawful interference, misreading, or defensive warranty interference, pointing to not reading the evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Haveli Lakha lawyer
