Find a Lawyer

NASIR MAHMOOD versus STATE

Section 302 (b), 364 A & 201 of the Claims Prosecution did not claim that the accused had abducted the minor, nor did he present any evidence Medical evidence did not prove that the juvenile The death of the girl was tortured or it was not natural that no witness of the alleged murder was mentioned or exposed during the investigation of the state case, but about one year and two after the incident. In a private complaint filed by the complainant months later, an eyewitness was introduced and during the initial evidence he also made a statement, but the trial During the sentence, he was released by the prosecution, as he was not prepared to appear in court before the court if he entered the witnesses' court. He supported the prosecution's case for alleged murder. The motive established by the prosecution was not only unhelpful, but it was also extremely unreliable, with no motive against the accused. He was not stained with blood and was not linked to the crime of being trapped in a mud, killing the slain girl In relation to the two witnesses, the complainant was cited in the calendar of the witnesses before him, before the trial court, and thus, the seriousness of the case was proved by the complainant that the accused Before the two witnesses were silenced, it was told how the deceased came. In his custody, where, how and how he killed the deceased and he told the dead body that famous supreme court advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer