Find a Lawyer

ATTAULLAH ALIAS QASIM versus STATE

Sections 7 (a) and 7 (c) of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337F (6) / 34 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (c) without appreciating the evidence. For some reason, the best evidence of a natural, independent, and injured prosecutor's witness could be withheld, at which point no one could be suspected of the incident, and for that reason it could be reasonably argued that if he was present in court If presented, it does not support litigation. The trial was directly contradicted by the evidence of the complainant from the evidence of the witnesses, and the case was amended in the same case when the statement of the witness was recorded after five burglaries to the extent that the prosecution changed the initial story of the police. was done. On a day that was not explained and such testimony could not be relied upon, it was not proved on record, presenting the sketch of the accused, eye witnesses possibly could not see the tour cycle, Especially when one of the complainants, according to the complainant, had his face amputated and the other was wearing a helmet, although an eyewitness claimed to have identified the shooter, but did not identify him. No identity tests have been performed for. There was no benefit to recover the pistol from the accused for the crime being vacated by the said witness, as the pistol was not presented to the court in evidence to show that it was sent to a ballistic expert and from this report is about. The said pistol was extended to the accused in the case of benefit and accordingly he was acquitted. online advocate from Doltala lawyer