DR. MANOJ KUMAR MALANI versus RETURNING OFFICER
Section 152 (1) (i) Sindh Local Government Election Rules, 2005, Art 14 and 65 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 nomination papers rejected The Returning Officer rejected the nomination papers filed by the applicant for the office of the Moderator. done. On the basis that the declaration of the applicant's assets was false, as the applicant's assets were not disclosed, the petitioner filed a petition against the nomination papers before dismissing the District Returning Officer. Was gone There was a gross violation of the principles of natural justice as they had no opportunity of hearing before their papers were rejected. That the Returning Officer and the District Returning Officer were enjoying new and false requests from the respondents to reject the nomination papers of the applicants. With the help of government machinery, the respondent manipulated and forged documents supporting the applicant's incompetence. If the defendant is suspected of the applicant's alleged ownership of the property in relation to some of the immovable and immovable properties, he is required to either conduct a detailed inquiry into the scope of the summary inquiry under R14 Required. The Municipal Election Rules, 2005 or the applicant should have been allowed to contest the elections, these controversial issues were decided by the Election Tribunals under the Sindh Local Government Election Rules 2005 R65 petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Rangoo lawyer