Find a Lawyer

ATTA MUHAMMAD versus MUNSIF SHAH

Sections 8 and 42 of the suit filed suit for their acquittal and declaration that they claimed that they obtained the award in connection with the suit property from a woman who obtained the power of the General Power of Attorney in her favor. But they were selling suit properties that allegedly did not belong to the lady who sold the suit property. Although the case has been underway since 1990, the plaintiff also allegedly failed to produce a Power of Attorney written and trivial testimony that it was not told whether the executive lady was dead or giving evidence. Unable to attend or couldn't attend. Evidence on the record shows that it was nowhere proven that the plaintiff allegedly hanged the Power of Attorney in favor of the accused lawyer, the testimony presented by the plaintiffs was that of the alleged executive woman. Didn't know, at the last minute, after a fifteen-year trial, the plaintiffs' lawyers wanted to go back. With the permission to file a fresh case or to amend the case with persons who were not parties to the TT, they have, over the past fifteen years, only relied on defendants' torture on a good ground. Was created because the time was right and allowing the plaintiffs to withdraw or amend the plaintiff in such a desolate phase would lead to illicit abuse and prolonged harassment. The parties' agreement was nothing but a sale agreement for which the plaintiffs could sue for specific performance. The defendants had been in possession of the suit property since the 1960s and their title was adjudicated. immigration advocates phone number from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer