Find a Lawyer

ARIF BARLAS versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 408/419/420/468/471 Guarantee, the amount of money obtained from various entities, companies and private persons as per the accused's grant in the daily newspaper FIR The ads posted were allegedly embezzled. The case was registered after three years of unreasonable delay when the accused had quit his job and no notice of alleged cause was issued against the accused. The case relied solely on documentary evidence, against which the potential for legal action could not possibly be tampered with. The accused was not to fall under the provisions of section 497 (1), section 468 and 471 of the PCC, reflecting the negligence of the PPC complaining organization or otherwise. According to the record, the majority of the alleged embezzlement amount was outstanding and due to the various organizations' cases against the accused's warrant, as contemplated under Section 497 (2), the circumstances of the CRPC I was accepted under bail tax advocates from Jhang lawyer