Find a Lawyer

REHMAT WALI versus STATE

Section 9 (c) contradicts the definition of evidence, as well as the statements of the prosecution's witnesses in connection with the recovery of the prohibited four, as well as the amounts reported in the forensic science laboratory report that 7 parcels were pulled from the lot. But this parcel data was nowhere in the record, and the parcel laboratory was made available 20 days after the alleged incident and no explanation was given about the delay, as well as its report. Was. Hours ago, the report was the same, not only was the gas cylinder containing marijuana broken, but also the marijuana had to be weighed, samples were to be prepared and seals were sent to parcels and corals, it was said that all the steps were sufficient time. It was not known, but it was also told how these movements were completed in minutes, nor was there any other passenger in the vehicle, nor his driver M. The investigating officer admitted that he himself did not see the accused inside the vehicle and did not even look at the gas cylinder, no constable was presented as a prosecution witness to direct and physically capture Chandra. Deprecated cylinder recovery. In this case, the investigating officer has made a poor inquiry into the case in which Morella was prepared, which contained an unknown number of packets and colors, the suspect in the recovery memo, etc., recovered the prohibited letters from him. Had created a profit. The benefit of the doubt in sitting with other passengers in the vehicle should be extended to the accused, in which case the decision of the trial case under which the accused should be law firms from Ziarat lawyer