MST. IRFANA FAIZ versus STATE
Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The basis for the dismissal of the FIR application of the constitutional application was based on the premise that the two accused, who had committed a voluntary court, married their marriage freely and married through the constitution. The rights of the defendant were secured, they were not registered by FIR certification against them that the male accused had allegedly divorced his ex-wife, the real accused sister's sister, and that She had married the woman accused only three days later, could not be approved by any legal or moral basis. In the present case, such a marriage cannot be legalized / extended to equitable / arbitrary relief by marrying the woman (accused) standing in the prohibited degree before the expiry of the term. ? The constitutional petition when his grant was against the order of immoral, unfair or good conscience and fair acting, the marriage between the accused was, in such cases, an unlawful alliance, by relief sought in the constitutional petition. This cannot be dismissed by the High Court, unless the accused had come to the High Court with clear hands, they were not entitled to such relief, the constitutional petition was dismissed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Toru lawyer