Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHID versus STATE

Section 409 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), section 5 (2) of the evidence was due to the strict security at the store and physical examination outside the premises, the accused could not possibly take drugs outside the store. ? The accused was lying in a large hall with other tables, which were divided into three sections by racking, but it is admitted that anyone can move from one table to another on which the racks are placed. It was handed over. In the end the drug superintendent had the keys to his custody, which provided more keys to the security officer, thus, there was no more oversight of the medicines at the shops after closing, leaving everything at the mercy of the security officer. Was given. In the event of an emergency, the competent officer may also dispense medicines with the permission of the relevant committee for transfer to hospitals, several months ago the CE suspect admittedly requested a request for medication insecurity, but in this regard I did not take any action and the answer given was that the same system was to continue to be charged, therefore, it cannot be said to be the sole protector. The drugs on his hostel and what he did wrongly benefitted the accused in the circumstances and accordingly he was acquitted. law firms from Barkhan lawyer