Find a Lawyer

MST. SAADAT SULTAN AND OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD ZAHUR KHAN

Article 42 of the Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (3 19733), Article ?55 (title) Declaration of the title and cancellation of the change Article Article 34 The opinion of the plaintiff by the written court In favor of the plaintiff confirming the cancellation of the certified sales mutation, on the basis of fraud and without consideration, the plaintiffs alleged that the landlord's signature on the disputed variable was a fraudulent claimant. The handwriting expert was found to be a fake who argued that the available signatures on the change were not made by the deceased owner. The trial, rather than relying on the expert expert's opinion, relied on the testimony of the defendant presented by the plaintiff and rejected the trial court's decision, upheld by the appellate court, Immediate, concrete and clear oral evidence was denied by the trial court by the defendant. Also, the conclusions of the concurrence of the facts recorded by the trial court of the High Court's justification rt and the appellate court maintained by the High Court cannot be ruled out without any legal justification which could be reduced in this case. Face to face. The following facts are discovered by the courts, although they were not diverted until they could be formulated. Evidence was not misread or read, Plaintiffs could not, at the conclusion, identify any misrepresentation or reading of the evidence by the courts below, which was in accordance with the evidence, which was rightly praised. Was. The courts had proved that by considering the matter of sale famous supreme court advocate from Pishin lawyer