Find a Lawyer

MST. RUKHSANA MEHDI versus WARYAM

Section 6 and 7 Land Reform Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115), Para 7 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Declaration of Land of Decision Review at present The mentioned petitioner was the applicant's husband and the applicant's complaint was that the surplus land resumed by the authorities had already been handed over to him, adding the same in the marriage claim claimed by the apex. Seven years after the land was restored, the authorities accepted their claim, but such order was rejected by the High Court with constitutional jurisdiction. The apex court had refused to grant leave to appeal against the order passed by the High Court that the Supreme Court had erred in applying the provisions of Para. 7 of the Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115), and the gift of the land was transferred under section 6 of the Land Reforms Act 1977, in favor of the applicant. At the relevant time, the analyst disclosed the disputed land as part of its holding, without mentioning custody. The reporters also used their choice of handing over the land due to the high area and not Neither the applicant nor the plaintiff ever contacted the revenue authorities to confirm this. Land gift changes in marriage, in response to the question, land gift registrations, did not see the light of day for about seven years and did not reflect in the income record of rights, at any stage of the proceedings, The assessee did not claim that he paid any land revenue in connection with the disputed land. inheritance advocates near Mangal Sada lawyer