Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus MST. SHAHEEN

Article 5 and Schedule Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961), Section 10 deals with the Downtown and it was taken away by husband Dover, he will remain as Dover, neither will he change nor will he. If taken away or taken away, it will be turned into civil liability. Neither the forced return of the wife by the husband, nor the provisions of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, nor the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, made it explicitly or implicitly that when the husband through the husband gave Dwyer. If he was taken away, his wife had to be questioned to recover it. The civil court paid Dover to the wife and, after being stripped of her husband, would be automatically restored to her duty and she would remain as Dover due to the wife, the family court ruled once. After that, it would become the property of the wife on which the domain was set up. Her snatching act would be equivalent to the disposal of her property and the power to take over the family court only. The same appellate court must have disputed the disputed judgment and decree in the Dover's recovery case and the Family Court verdict and the Family Court injunction S had committed legal error regarding the denial of legal rights and the plaintiff was instructed to turn in civil court for recovery. Without legal authority, the appellate court's probate decision and order were set aside and it was directed to decide the entire case / appeal on the merit. law firms from Kabir Wala lawyer